whiteflame

Short films, by the people who still finish them.

Now showing — week 17, 2026

Five films for a slow afternoon.

Programs — spring 2026

Four rooms, four ways of looking.

Program 01

Documentary

Observational, patient, occasionally polemic. Films that sit with a subject for longer than the news cycle allows.

8 films →

Program 02

Visual Essay

Cinema that argues. Image, text and voice-over woven together to think out loud about a single small thing.

8 films →

Program 03

Short Drama

Scripted work from writer-directors under forty. Mostly one location, mostly two actors, never longer than it needs to be.

8 films →

Program 04

Animation

Hand-drawn, painted, stop-motion, cut paper. Work that still carries the weight of the human hand behind the frame.

8 films →
“We made a home for the films that don't need to go viral.” — from the editor's note, April 2026

In partnership with

Festival friends, spring programme.

Notes from the editors

Why we built this room.

Whiteflame began, like most stubborn things, as a conversation held too late at night. Three of us had spent the better part of a decade watching short films get buried between brand ads and algorithmic noise, and we were tired. Tired of the way a fourteen-minute piece a filmmaker had worked on for two years would be served up beside a cat video and a crypto ad, and of the way the platforms insisted that the problem was the filmmaker — not the room. So we decided, quite un-modestly, to make a different room. No autoplay. No recommendations. No ranking signals except a human editor with a calendar and a small set of opinions.

We are not trying to be a festival, a streamer, or a magazine. We are trying to be a weekly shelf. Every Monday, a small, curated program of short films opens at whiteflame.net. It stays up for seven days. On the following Monday, most of it goes to rest and a new program takes its place. A handful of films graduate into a permanent collection we call the archive, where they can be revisited without scrolling past anything. We do not pay ourselves from ad revenue, because there is no ad revenue; the site carries nothing that could reasonably be called advertising. The operating costs are covered by a small contribution from the filmmakers whose work we publish, by occasional grants, and by the founders' other jobs. That is, for the moment, enough.

What we ask of visitors is equally modest. Watch one film a week, if any at all. Send us a note if something moved you, or if something didn't. Tell a friend whose taste you trust. Do not share the films on social platforms that will compress them into nine vertical seconds — send a link to the film's page, instead, so the filmmaker's name, the country of origin, and the running time are visible before the first frame. That may sound like a small piece of etiquette. It is, in fact, the whole point: to let a film exist on its own terms, in the shape its maker gave it, in a room built for it.

— Miriam Holloway, founding editor.
Oakland, April 2026.

Submissions

Send us your film.

We read every submission. We reply within three working days, even when the answer is no. No submission fee, no template, no rush.